Cover Stories
WHY DON & DORIS FISHER WANT TO BUILD A CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM AT THE PRESIDIO | WHY DON & DORIS FISHER WANT TO BUILD A CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM AT THE PRESIDIO |
|
|
|
| Written by John Gollin | |
| Saturday, 02 February 2008 | |
|
In 1969, San Francisco natives Don and Doris Fisher opened a small store on Ocean Avenue called Gap – a reference to “generation gap.” The store at its start sold jeans and records, but within months they dropped the records. The Gap grew into a multilocation company. In 1974, it launched its own brand, and in 1976, the Gap went public. Over the past 30 years, the Fishers have built an exceptional collection of more than 1,000 objects of modern and contemporary art. They began by collecting prints, and went on to add paintings, sculpture, drawings, photographs, and other media.
On December 3 of last year, Mr. and Mrs. Fisher unveiled the design of an art museum they propose to build in San Francisco’s Presidio. The museum, to be known as Contemporary Art Museum at the Presidio (CAMP), will house the Fisher’s collection. On January 30, the Presidio Trust announced that it has accepted the Fisher’s proposal and will begin working with them to make the museum a reality. In addition to the museum building, the Fishers will renovate a nearby barracks, Building 101, which will house the museum’s bookstore and public education programs, including a photo studio, ceramics studio, and painting and drawing classes. The museum’s architect, Richard Gluckman of the firm, Gluckman Mayner, is one of the country’s foremost museum architects. Gluckman Mayner’s projects include the Whitney Museum of Art, the Andy Warhol Museum and the Georgia O’Keeffe Museum. In a recent interview Mrs. Fisher said, “we are extremely proud of this project [CAMP] and we are thrilled to have the chance to give something back to the city that we love.” On January 21, Northside San Francisco met with Mr. Fisher at Gap Headquarters on Folsom Street. We spoke with him in one of the galleries there, surrounded by masterpieces from the Fisher collection.
NORTHSIDE S.F.: Why have you and Mrs. Fisher brought forward this proposal to build the Contemporary Art Museum at the Presidio? Why now?
FISHER:
Doris and I have decided that this is the right time to do something
with our art. We’ve been thinking about it for a long time. We have a
very large collection. Our philosophy, and I think a main reason for
the museum to exist, is to educate the public. We’re doing this to
educate the public in the art that we’ve collected. And of course we
want others to enjoy the art as we have.
NORTHSIDE S.F.: Why not simply donate your collection to an existing museum?
FISHER:
There is no guarantee that if we were to donate our art to an existing
museum that the art will be shown. We wanted as much of it as possible
to be shown and available to the public. We determined that the only
way to make that happen was to build something ourselves. The Presidio
seemed like the ideal site to construct a museum to house our
collection. I had been on the Presidio Board and knew that there was an
area that had been designated for a museum or a building of that sort
at the head of the Parade Grounds. So, we decided to make an
unsolicited offer to the Presidio. They then put the site out to bid to
see if anyone else was interested in using the same space. It’s done in
a very democratic fashion.
FISHER:
We want the museum to stay contemporary. So, we expect to bring in
shows that will be very much of interest to a great number of people
from the public. That’s very important to us.
FISHER:
Yes, we will have educational programs. We will have an educational
curator. I expect that we’re going to have a photo studio to teach
people photography. We’ll probably have a ceramics studio. We may have
a wood shop. We’ll definitely have painting and drawing classes. We’ll
have lectures by artists and art historians and so forth. We want to
make it an active place. The whole objective of this is to get the
public involved. It’s not something we’re doing for ourselves.
FISHER:
Once the museum is built it will be part of a foundation. The art will
be as well. We won’t necessarily be running the museum. It will have a
board of trustees of one form or another. After we’re gone, it will be
much more publicly managed than it will when we’re around. One of the
things I want to do is have some fun curating some of our own art
shows. I’ve been doing it with our collection. FISHER: I think that the museum fits in very well. I think the museum will be a catalyst to bringing other like-minded kinds of organizations into the Presidio. This museum will attract people to the Presidio. While they are there they will be able to go around the park and see some of the historical things that are located there. I also think that there is an opportunity for the Presidio itself to have sculpture around its 1,450 acres. I think they could make it a very interesting place.
NORTHSIDE S.F.:
How do you answer critics who say that the design of the museum doesn’t
work in the Presidio with its historic military type structures?
FISHER:
The architecture in the Presidio is good in some areas and not so good
in others. There have been questions about our architecture. People
like our architecture. And people don’t like our architecture. Some
people think it fits, and some don’t think it fits. The rules for
historical areas set by the interior department say that architecture
should be of its time. When you look at the Presidio, you see the
barracks buildings that were built in 1890. They were of their time.
There are other buildings that have been built since that time, and
they are completely different types of architecture. The Officer’s Club
is a different architecture, and the Golden Gate Club is a totally
different architecture. You’ll find that there is a tremendous amount
of variation throughout the Presidio in the kind of architecture that
is there. Those buildings were designed as of their time. Our museum
will be of its time, so we feel that it will fit in very nicely.
FISHER:
I think that we have a tremendously talented architect with a national
reputation, who has done a really nice job. His name is Richard
Gluckman. I think that the way that he’s designed the museum with the
glass that he has on the outside of the building gives the visitors to
the Presidio an exciting look into the museum from the outside. This to
me makes much more sense than building a box of masonry.
FISHER:
We will be advancing $10 million toward relandscaping the Parade
Grounds. I think that there is every intention that the Parade Grounds
will be finished at the same time as the museum, so there’ll be a
beautiful landscaped area all the way from the top of the Parade
Grounds on down. Ultimately, the landscaping will go right down to the
Bay and it’s going to make the place very attractive for people to come
and enjoy. I think that everyone has seen the kind of attendance and
interest that people have in Crissy Field since that was redone. It’s
become a very popular public spot, and we hope that will happen for the
balance of the Presidio.
FISHER:
We started our company in 1969. In about 1976 we went public. So, we
had a little money. And we started buying prints to put on our walls in
our offices, and from there we got a little more aggressive and started
buying paintings, and over time the collection grew. We’ve got a big
collection of prints, and all the prints that we’ve collected are in
sets. We just don’t buy one or two pictures from an artist’s collection
of prints. If they’ve got eight or nine, we’ll buy all of them. I think
there’s much more impact, and I think that you can understand the
artist if you have the whole set.
FISHER:
I wouldn’t say that we have one philosophy that underlies our
collecting. Our collection is such that we buy what we like. We haven’t
had a curator. One of the philosophies that we had was that we didn’t
want to buy anything that we couldn’t sell at auction. You may buy a
piece of art that you like at a particular time. But as time passes
that may change, and ultimately you decide you no longer want it. If
you are unable to sell it, you’ll have a whole basement of art that you
end up not liking. And so we thought it was important that we’d be able
to sell some of the art if we wanted to. It so happens that we’ve sold
very few pieces. FISHER: As it turns out, the artists that we’ve followed and liked, we’ve followed at depth and we haven’t just bought one piece of a certain artist. We’re sitting here in the Warhol area, and we have one of the better collections of Warhol. And we did that because it’s really hard if you’re building a collection that will have a national reputation to do it with artists that nobody’s heard of. There are lots of good artists out there, and as for me, I can’t really figure out what makes an artist popular or not popular. I don’t know if it’s the dealers, or the auction houses, or what it is. At any rate, we have a collection that includes many artist that are well-known.
NORTHSIDE S.F.: Do you have a favorite piece? Why is it your favorite?
FISHER:
I think that my favorite piece today is this William Kentridge piece
that’s right here (Gestures to side room that has the Kentridge
installation.) He’s a real contemporary artist. I’d say his art is
from the year 2000 on. I think he’s doing things that nobody else has
done. I give a lot of respect to creativity. I think that that is what
makes the world go ‘round. From my point of view, I get really turned
on when I see some art that nobody has done before or thought about
before. It’s unbelievable. We just bought some more of his pieces in
New York this last couple of days because he has a show at Marian
Goodman’s. And what he’s doing just blows your mind. And its not one of
the more expensive pieces, so it is not a matter of dollars. NORTHSIDE S.F.: Thank you, Mr. Fisher. |
|
| Last Updated ( Monday, 03 March 2008 ) |